Ashwathanarayana et al. 2017). A bicentric study by Prasad et al. (2010) indicated
the superiority of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in the detection and management of
NENs with unknown primary sites (Prasad and Baum 2010).
Metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) coupled with the theranostic pair of 123I/131I
has been of immense utility in the detection and treatment of NENs, especially
neuroblastomas and pheochromocytoma-paragangliomas (Bombardieri et al. 2010;
Decarolis et al. 2013; Schmidt et al. 2008). Treatment of advanced neuroblastomas
with 131I-mIBG has shown response rates of 20–40%, with an acceptable toxicity
profile with/without chemotherapy followed by stem-cell rescue (Zhou et al. 2015).
As previously discussed, the development of PSMA-based ligands for diagnosis
and therapy has been a game changer in prostate cancer. The primary PSMA-based
ligands in current use include PSMA-11 (68Ga-based), PSMA-I&T (imaging and
therapy), PSMA-1007 and DCFPyL (18F-based), 99mTc-PSMA, and PSMA-617
(therapy with 177Lu), among others (Prasad et al. 2016a; Singh et al. 2021). A
biodistribution study in prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA-11 is shown (Fig. 7.1).
A randomized controlled trial of mCRPC patients treated with either 177Lu-PSMA-
617 radioligand therapy (RLT) or cabazitaxel showed more frequent PSA-based
responses in the RLT arm (66% vs 37%) with lesser incidence of Grade 3 or
4 adverse events (33% vs 53%) (Hofman et al. 2021).
Angiogenesis which is an essential step in tumor growth and metastasis is a useful
pathway for molecular targeting. αvβ3 integrin targeting using RGD peptides (argi-
nine-glycine-aspartate),
labelled
with
68Ga,
is
used
for
the
detection
of
neo-angiogenesis (Fig. 7.2) and can be more accurate in detection of malignancies
such as breast and thyroid carcinoma in comparison to 18F-FDG (Parihar et al. 2018f,
Fig. 7.1 A known case of castration-resistant metastatic prostate carcinoma with 68Ga-PSMA-11
PET/CT showing diffuse disseminated skeletal metastases involving the multiple bones of the axial
and proximal appendicular skeleton
100
B. Singh et al.